loader image
  1. Home
  2. Cono Morse Ingles
  3. Cono Morse Implants

Cono Morse Implants

Survival Rate for monoblock Implants: 96, 79% after 5 years. 20 artícles reviwed (1995-2011). Barrachina-Diez JM1, Tashkandi E, Stampf S, Att W. Long-term outcome of one- piece implants. Part I: implant characteristics and loading…

Cono Morse Implants

Survival Rate for monoblock Implants: 96, 79% after 5 years. 20 artícles reviwed (1995-2011).

Barrachina-Diez JM1, Tashkandi E, Stampf S, Att W. Long-term outcome of one- piece implants. Part I: implant characteristics and loading protocols. A syste- matic literature review with meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):503-18. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2790.

When using Morse taper dental implants and platform switching less periimplantitis appearance, lower bone loss and long term aesthetic stability is expected.

Macedo JP1, Pereira J1, Vahey BR2, Henriques B3, Benfatti CA3, Magini RS1, Ló- pez-López J4, Souza JC3. Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology. Eur J Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):148-54. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175677. De 287 estudios identificados (1961-2014), se seleccionaron 81 estudios.

Morse Taper connection is more effective in relation to biological aspects, reduce crestal bone resorption and less bacterial contamination in single implants, including aesthetic regions. In addition, this connection can be successfully indicated for fixed partial dentures since it exhibits high mechanical stability.

Goiato MC1, Pellizzer EP, da Silva EV, Bonatto Lda R, dos Santos DM. Is the inter- nal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;19(3):229-42. doi: 10.1007/s10006-015-0494-5. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

Morse taper connection provides better results in temrs of abutments adjustment, antibacterial sealing performance and long-term stability.

Schmitt CM1, Nogueira-Filho G, Tenenbaum HC, Lai JY, Brito C, Döring H, Non- hoff J. Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Feb;102(2):552-74. doi: 10.1002/ jbm.a.34709. Epub 2013 May 9.

Subcrestal placement (SCL) of adjcent implants with Cone Morse connection and platform shifting was more efficent in the crestal bone preservation between implants tan in the equi crestal ones (ELC).

Barros RR1, Novaes AB Jr, Muglia VA, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Apr 1;21(4):371-8. PMID: 20128832 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01860.x

The features of the join implant-abutment may be a reason of the observed differences in the mechanical stability. The micro gap observed in the internal hexagonal connection facing the non-detectable separation in the Cone Morse connection.

Scarano A1, Mortellaro C, Mavriqi L, Pecci R, Valbonetti L. Evaluation of Micro- gap With Three-Dimensional X-Ray Microtomography: Internal Hexagon  Versus Cone Morse. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 May;27(3):682-5. doi: 10.1097/ SCS.0000000000002563.

USAL clinical study for clinica ZIACOM
ZIACOM expands its product offering including new biomaterials
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
post
tribe_events

Categorías

Menu
.